Archive for The Economy

Communism!!!

Man, the likely GM restructuring is like totally Communism. Not necessarily in a bad or good way but I’m really excited to see how it shakes out.

You see, GM owes a lot of people money. We call those people creditors. And one of the biggie creditors is the International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, better known as the United Auto Workers, about the same known as the UAW.

You see, GM owes the UAW about $26 billion to pay for commitments GM made to pay for retiree health benefits that GM did not appropriately prefund (should have talked to your actuary dudes). But the restructuring agreements being bandied about make it seem likely that the UAW will get some or all of that as stock in the newly reborn GM. So the UAW will be a big owner of GM. Which means, you bright-eyed bushy-tailed Marxists, that the workers will own the means of production.

Communism!

It’ll be interesting to see how this turns out. Will they bring sense and decency to automotive business practices and offer a welcome check from hubris? Will they continue the proud American tradition of selling the long-term to pay for the short-term? Only time will tell. On one hand it is hard to see how they could screw it up worse than past leadership. On the other hand, never challenge someone to disappoint you.

I’ll keep you posted.

Love,
Drizzle

Leave a Comment

Nationlization – Intro

Everyone is talking about AIG right now. More generally, people are asking if we’ve gotten our money’s worth from our various bailouts/investments/rescue packages. And some are saying we should nationalize these banks and other financial institutions if we are going to provide them with financial life’s blood. “Hell” say these voices, “we own 80 percent of AIG, why aren’t we telling them what to do and who to give bonuses to”. Of course, opponents of nationalization say that it’s the first step to socialism/communism/fascism/narcissism.

I want to add my two cents to this debate, not the least of the reasons being that I have a bottle of wine riding on whether 3 major banks get nationalized by March 31st (I’m betting against). However, I don’t think answering the question “To nationalize or not to nationalize” really advances the discussion. That is because there are three questions about how to proceed with a failed bank or financial institution: who takes the loss, who takes control and how fast do things need to happen. I’ll try to address the various sides of each of those questions in subsequent posts.

Tune in soon for a witty and brilliant post on who gets a haircut when a too big to fail bank is about to fail (who gets a haircut? really? that’s the best financial reporters can come up with?). See you soon.

Love,
Drizzle

Leave a Comment

Whiny single yuppies and the Future of this Country

I wanted to blog about this article and give a scathing indictment of the self-absorbed materialistic wastes of space that the piece profiles but I got slow and lazy and my friend beat me to it. So I’m going to take a different approach.

These people are the only ones who can save our economy.
Read the rest of this entry »

Leave a Comment

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.